Allowed¶23

Arvind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Mar 2025CR. MISC./7178/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted; Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.7178 of 2025; Arvind Kumar v. State of Bihar; Atri P.S. Case No. 414 of 2024 (Gaya); S. 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act; 84 litres illicit country-made liquor; two motorcycles; custody since 05.11.2024; bail-bond Rs.20,000 with two sureties; decided 04-03-2025 by Chandra Prakash Singh, J.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Gaya, in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 414 of 2024. ¶23

Arvind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7178 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-414 Year-2024 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Arvind Kumar Son of Sanjay Ravidas Resident of Village- Pated Mangrawa, P.S.- Wazirganj, Distt.- Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aryan Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 04-03-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 414 of 2024 dated 04.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, total 84 litres of illicit country-made liquor was recovered from the two motorcycles.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not the owner of the said vehicle. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7178 of 2025(2) dt.04-03-2025 2/2

¶18

the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 05.11.2024.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed

¶20

the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned,

¶22

Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 414 of 2024.

¶23

The application stands allowed.

¶24

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶25

shivam/-

¶26

U T

Arvind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Sattar Vs The State of Bihar

Nepali Gope @ Suresh Prasad Gope @ Suresh Gope Vs The State of Bihar

Ajit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Khairuddin Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Giri @ Rakesh Kumar Giri @ Tun Tun Giri Vs The State of Bihar