Allowed¶7

Ajit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Mar 2025CR. MISC./5540/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail; Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act S. 30(a); illicit liquor recovery 36 litres; motorcycle; Excise P.S. Case No. 1962 of 2024; East Champaran; Dhaka P.S.; Motihari; custody since 18.11.2024; bail-bond Rs.20,000 with two sureties; Cr. Misc. No.5540 of 2025; Patna High Court; Justice Chandra Prakash Singh; decided 03-03-2025.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted: petitioner to be enlarged on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 1962 of 2024. ¶7

Ajit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5540 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1962 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ajit Kumar Son of Ramsunahi Rai village -Karsahiya ward 13 P.S.- Dhaka District- East Champaran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhannjay Kumar Ii For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 03-03-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P for the State.

¶15

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 1962 of 2024 dated 17.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

3 . As per the prosecution case, total 36 litres of illicit Nepali country made liquor was recovered from the sack kept on the motorcycle.

¶17

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not the owner of the said vehicle. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5540 of 2025(2) dt.03-03-2025 2/2

¶19

been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 18.11.2024.

¶20

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 1962 of 2024.

¶22

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

guddukr/-

¶25

U T

Ajit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dhanjit Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Arbind Kumar @ Sachin Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Sattar Vs The State of Bihar

Nepali Gope @ Suresh Prasad Gope @ Suresh Gope Vs The State of Bihar

Parshuram Kumar @ Pasuram Kumar Vs The State of Bihar