Allowed¶19

Vinit Kumar @ Vineet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jan 2025CR. MISC./70775/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.70775 of 2024; Vinit Kumar @ Vineet Kumar v. State of Bihar; bail granted 15-01-2025 by Anjani Kumar Sharan, J; Balwahat P.S. Case No. 34 of 2024, District Saharsa; offences u/s 323, 324, 325, 341, 307, 354B, 379, 504, 506, 34 IPC; assault with butt of pistol on informant; custody since 29.06.2024; bail bond Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of like amount.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Balwahat P.S. Case No. 34 of 2024. ¶19

Vinit Kumar @ Vineet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70775 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2024 Thana- Balwahat District- Saharsa

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vinit Kumar @ Vineet Kumar Son of Rami Yadav Resident of Village- Katho, PS- Balwahat, District- Saharsa

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

5 15-01-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 323, 324, 325, 341, 307, 354B, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the I.P.C.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, petitioner assaulted the informant by means of butt of a pistol due to which she sustained injury.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. There is land dispute between the parties. It is further submitted that the injury of the informant was found

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70775 of 2024(5) dt.15-01-2025 2/2

¶17

grievous in nature. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been rotting in judicial custody since 29.06.2024.

¶18

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and the period of custody, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Balwahat P.S. Case No.34 of 2024.

¶20

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶21

shikha/-

¶22

U T

Vinit Kumar @ Vineet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinit Kumar @ Vineet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pappu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Firoz Vs The State of Bihar

Lalan Das @ Lalan Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjeet Kumar @ Langar Kumar Pasi @ Langar @ Langar Pasi Vs The State of Bihar

Yashasvi @ Yashasvi Rai Vs The State of Bihar