Md. Firoz Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16728 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-385 Year-2019 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Firoz SON OF MD. IBRAHIM village -Kokani P S- Hasanpur District -Samastipur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

===============	====	... ... Opposite Party/s ===================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s	:	Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Adv.
For the State	:	Mr. Dinesh Singh, APP
For the Complainant ===============	: ====	Mr. Hafiz Shahbaz Arif, Adv. ===================================
CORAM: HONOU	RABL	E MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶9

6 10-01-2025

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for

¶12

the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Petitioner, who is husband of complainant, is said to have ousted the complainant from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. He submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in custody since

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16728 of 2024(6) dt.10-01-2025 2/3

¶16

11.10.2023.

¶17

In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 385 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C..

¶18

Petitioner is ready to pay Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand) per month to opposite party no.2 in the second week of every month. If the petitioner fails to pay the aforesaid amount on two consecutive months, opposite party no.2 shall be at liberty to move before the learned Court below for cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶19

It goes without saying that the aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial maintenance case or any other collateral proceedings.

¶20

Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is directed to make available the bank account details of opposite party no.2 within a period of two weeks by submitting affidavit of the same before the learned Court Below.

¶21

If so advised, either of the parties will be at

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16728 of 2024(6) dt.10-01-2025 3/3

¶23

liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

¶24

Accordingly, this application stands disposed

¶25

of.

¶26

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶27

anand/-

¶28

U T

Md. Firoz v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Firoz v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anand Kumar Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Babali Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar