Allowed¶20

Subham Kumar @ Subham Anand v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Feb 2025CR. MISC./65484/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail granted - CR. MISC. No.65484 of 2024, Patna High Court, decided 17-02-2025 (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J.). Offences: S.30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; Ss.21(b) and 29 NDPS Act. Alleged recovery: 4.5 liters foreign liquor and 6.83 grams brown sugar, below commercial quantity. Five criminal antecedents, on bail in all; custody since 28.04.2024. Conditions: bail bond Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each before Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS, Supaul (Birpur P.S. Case No. 155 of 2024).

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted; petitioner to be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS, Supaul. ¶20

Subham Kumar @ Subham Anand Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65484 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2024 Thana- BIRPUR District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Subham Kumar @ Subham Anand Son of Ashok Bhindwar @ Ashok Kumar Yadav Resident of village- Birpur Ward no. 09, P.S.- Birpur, District- Supaul

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

5 17-02-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections, 21(b) and 29 of the NDPS Act.

¶15

The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner altogether 4.5 liters of foreign liquor and 6.83 grams of brown sugar were recovered.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. The amount of the contraband which has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner is more than small quantity but is much less than

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65484 of 2024(5) dt.17-02-2025 2/2

¶18

commercial quantity. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has five criminal antecedents but he is on bail in all those cases. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 28.04.2024.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 155 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS, Supaul.

¶21

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶22

Shubham/-

Subham Kumar @ Subham Anand v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subham Kumar @ Subham Anand v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balram Mehta Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar @ Manish Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sadanand Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ravindra Ram @ Rabindra Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Maya Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Sultan Vs The State of Bihar