Dismissed

Manjay Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Dec 2025CR. MISC./60792/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A renewed regular bail application, earlier rejected, came before the High Court. Despite a court direction to file a supplementary affidavit proving he was not absconding in six pending cases, the petitioner never filed it and counsel sought yet more time. Finding no use in further delay, the Court rejected bail but permitted renewal.

What did the court decide?

Bail prayer rejected; petitioner permitted to renew it once able to apprise the Court of the status of pending cases against him.

Manjay Sahni Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60792 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2021 Thana- BALIGAON District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Manjay Sahni S/o Vijay Sahni Resident Of Village- Pindauta Buzurg, PSTisiaouta, District- Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh No. I, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Shaheen Begum, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 19-12-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The prayer for bail of the petitioner has earlier been rejected vide order dated 04.12.2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 72446 of 2024.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 12.09.2025, the petitioner was directed to file a supplementary affidavit bringing on record substantial proof to show that he is not absconding in any of the cases pending against him, which are six in number. The said affidavit has not been filed till date. Once again, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks further time to file the same, submitting that he has not received any instructions from the petitioner.

¶16

This matter has been pending since September,

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60792 of 2025(4) dt.19-12-2025 2/2

¶18

2025 and despite sufficient opportunity having been granted to the petitioner to file the said supplementary affidavit, the same has not been filed till date.

¶19

In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that keeping the present application pending any further would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner in connection with S. Tr. No. 156 of 2024, arising out of Baligaon P.S. Case No. 142 of 2021, pending before the learned A.D.J. XV, Vaishali at Hajipur, is hereby rejected.

¶20

However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail as and when he is in a position to apprise this Court about the status of the pending cases against him.

¶21

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶22

Ashwini/-

¶23

U T

Manjay Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manjay Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brajnandan Sahay, Vs The State of Bihar

Rinku Kumari @ Kumari Rinku @ Rinku Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Rishi Kant Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Kishori Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Sahid Khan @ Shahid Khan @ Sahid @ Sajid @ Sazid Vs The State of Bihar

Chote Lal Singh @ Chote Lal Kushwaha Vs The State of Bihar