Disposed¶32

Brajnandan Sahay, v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Dec 2025CWJC/1412/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Brajnandan Sahay; Graduate Qualified Revenue Karmchari; confirmation of service; pay scale; Memo No. 353 dated 18.05.2017; representation dated 13.09.2019; Annexure-5; Collector Saran at Chapra; Respondent No. 4; reasoned and speaking order; 90 days from date of production of order; writ of mandamus; Finance Department; Department of Revenue and Land Reforms; State of Bihar; CWJC No.1412 of 2022; disposed off without adjudicating merits; Dr. Anshuman, J; decision date 17-12-2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Collector, Saran at Chapra (Respondent no.4) to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the representation filed by the petitioner (Annexure-5) within 90 days from the date of production of the order. ¶32

Brajnandan Sahay, Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Brajnandan Sahay, son of Late Ganesh Prasad, Resident of Kanhauli, Manohar, P.O.-Pucchari, P.S.-Baniyapur, District-Saran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principle Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principle Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Deputy Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Collector, Saran at Chapra.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore (AG) Mr. Rajkishore Roy (GP-18) ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 17-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

counsel for the State.

¶16

The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s):-

¶17

“I. For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus to confirm the service of the petitioner to the post of Graduate

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.1412 of 2022(3) dt.17-12-2025

¶19

2/4

¶20

Qualified Revenue Karmchari in terms of the recommendation given as contained in Memo No. 353 dated 18.05.2017 and in consequent thereof the pay scale attached to the said post may be granted to him.

¶21

II. For a direction to the respondent

¶22

authorities to consider the

¶23

representation dated 13.09.2019 given by the petitioner before Respondent No. 4.

¶24

III. Also for any other relief/ reliefs if petitioner found entitle in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer for issuance of writ of mandamus has been made. Counsel submits that the petitioner has filed a representation dated 13.09.2019 before the Collector, Saran at Chapra (Respondent no.4) which is annexed as Annexure-5. But, no decision has been taken on the said representation till date. The extract of the petitioner’s representation is reproduced here under:-

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.1412 of 2022(3) dt.17-12-2025

¶27

3/4

¶28

Learned counsel for the State submits that from the record, it transpires that the petitioner’s representation is pending before the Collector, Saran at Chapra. He submits that a

¶29

Patna High Court CWJC No.1412 of 2022(3) dt.17-12-2025 4/4

¶30

time frame may be fixed so that order may be passed on the petitioner’s representation.

¶31

As such, without entering into the merit or demerit of the case, the Collector, Saran at Chapra (Respondent no.4) is hereby directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the representation filed by the petitioner which is annexed as Annexure-5, within 90 days from the date of production of the order.

¶32

Accordingly, with the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed off.

¶33

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶34

Divyansh/-

¶35

Brajnandan Sahay, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brajnandan Sahay, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rinku Kumari @ Kumari Rinku @ Rinku Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Rishi Kant Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Sonam Kumari @ Sonam Devi, Vs The State of Bihar

Kishori Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Sahid Khan @ Shahid Khan @ Sahid @ Sajid @ Sazid Vs The State of Bihar

Chote Lal Singh @ Chote Lal Kushwaha Vs The State of Bihar