Kare Singh Vs The State of Bihar

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 140(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 corresponding to Section 365 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

The case of the prosecution in short is that two unknown persons took away the son of the informant, namely, Deepak Kumar @ Chippu. When he did not return till night, he was being searched. He was called on his mobile, but his mobile was switched off.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57402 of 2025(4) dt.12-12-2025 2/3

¶20

committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the occurrence is of 16.03.2025, which is regarding the missing of Deepak, but the FIR has been lodged on 18.03.2025 after a delay of two days. He also submits that during the course of investigation in para-6 of the case diary, one Pawan Kumar Singh has given his statement and has stated that the petitioner along with others has taken away the deceased. In para-45 of the diary, one Principal Kumar has given his confessional statement wherein he has stated that the petitioner is also his associate and that he is indulged in other crimes also and that he has confessed his guilt. From perusal of the postmortem report, it is clear that the doctors have opined that the death was due to neurogenic and hemorrhagic shock as a result of ante-mortem injury caused by a hard and blunt object. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR; his name has surfaced in the story developed by the prosecution. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 30.05.2025.

¶21

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57402 of 2025(4) dt.12-12-2025 3/3

¶23

for the State.

¶24

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Begusarai in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025.

¶25

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶26

Sudhanshu/-

¶27

U T

Kare Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kare Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ujjawal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Praduman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Monu Rai @ Manu Rai @ Manu Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Rajak Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar Sah @ Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Babu Keshri @ Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar