Rupesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shantanu Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bishweshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 11-08-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶13

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 270 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25 (1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act.

¶15

As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of one loaded country made pistol from the waist of co-accused Shaalu Kumar. It is further alleged that from the possession of petitioner no.1, Rupesh Kumar, Samsung mobile was recovered and from the possession of the petitioner no. 2, Dheeraj Kumar, infinix mobile was recovered.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53196 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3

¶18

petitioners are in custody since 10.05.2025 and bear no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel orally submits that charge sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence. Petitioners have no concern with the apprehended co-accused,Shaalu Kumar, from whose possession one country made pistol was recovered. Learned counsel submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. Petitioners are quite innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case.

¶19

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, keeping in view clean antecedent of the petitioners, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 270 of 2025, subject to following conditions:-

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53196 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3

¶22

(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

¶23

(ii) Petitioners will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

¶24

(iii) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶25

(iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

¶26

(v) Petitioner shall submit an undertaking before the learned trial court that he bears no criminal antecedent and if the said undertaking is found incorrect by the learned trial court, his bail bond shall not be accepted.

¶27

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶28

vashudha/-

¶29

U T

Rupesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rupesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary

Rakesh Sada Vs The State of Bihar

Bhulan Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Narendra Rai @ Nirendra Rai Vs The state of Bihar

Manikant Kumar @ Manikant @ Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Devendra Sharma Vs The State of Bihar