This is an order granting bail to a petitioner in custody for offences under the Arms Act and NDPS Act. The High Court, despite an objection regarding potential trial delay, extended bail subject to strict conditions including appearance fortnightly.
Petitioner to be released on bail on Rs. 10,000 with two sureties subject to conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50175 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2010 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria
======================================================
Shisho Yadav S/O Late Mano Yadav Resident of Village- Mathor, P.SMuffasil (Khagaria), Dist- Khagaria, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
2 11-08-2025 Heard the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50175 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3
issuance of process under section 83 of the Cr.P.C.and he is in custody since 09.05.2025. If granted bail, he shall be diligently appearing in trial.
(i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50175 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3
bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight till the conclusion of the trial to mark his attendance;
(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's bail prayer is to be allowed or dismissed given prior misuse of grant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shisho Yadav
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
