Allowed¶15

Sujit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Aug 2025CR. MISC./47454/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRM 47454/2025, Patna High Court, oral order dated 04-08-2025 by Shailendra Singh, J: regular bail granted to Sujit Kumar s/o Shiv Paswan (custody since 04.05.2025) in Vaishali PS Case No. 256 of 2025 dated 03.05.2025 for BNS Ss.127(6), 143(3), 144(2), 64, 61(2) and ITPA Ss.3-8; defence of bona fide hotel visit with Veena Kumari for imminent marriage; investigation complete; parity with co-accused Dipak Kumar (Cr. Misc. No. 43418 of 2025, bail order 16.07.2025); bond Rs. 20,000 with two like sureties; State opposed via APP Binod Kumar No. 3; counsel Vijay Kumar and Sushma Kumari.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted: petitioner enlarged on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 256 of 2025.

Sujit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47454 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-256 Year-2025 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sujit Kumar S/O Shiv Paswan R/vill- Sahdullahpur, P.S -Vaishali, DisttVaishali.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Kumar, Adv. : Mrs. Sushma, Kumari, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar No. 3, APP. ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 04-08-2025

¶9

Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Binod Kumar No. 3, learned APP for the State.

¶10

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 256 of 2025 dated 03.05.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(6), 143(3), 144(2), 64, 61(2) of the BNS and Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act.

¶11

3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner’s counsel are that the instant matter relates to immoral activity which was allegedly running at three hotels though the petitioner was apprehended from one of the hotel alongwith a girl Veena Kumari, but in fact he and the said girl went to the said hotel bonafidely and their marriage had been fixed at that time and they were going to solemnize marriage and in this regard specific statement has been made in the paragraph no. 7 of the petition. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been languishing in jail

¶12

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47454 of 2025(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/2

¶13

since 4.5.2025 and he has no connection to the alleged hotel and against him the investigation has been completed. It is lastly submitted that one co-accused namely, Dipak Kumar carrying similar nature of allegation, has been granted bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 16.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 43418 of 2025.

¶14

4. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶15

5. Considering the aforesaid submissions and mainly petitioner’s aforesaid defence as to he and one Veena Kumari were present at the alleged hotel bonafidely and their marriage was to be solemnized very soon and coupled with petitioner’s custody period and completion of investigation against him, this court is inclined to release him on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/(Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 256 of 2025.

¶16

(Shailendra Singh, J)

¶17

siddharthkr/- U T

Sujit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Monu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar @ Manish Paswan @ Monu @ Mannu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Tejan Rai @ Tejnarayan Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Mohammed Khursid @ Munna Vs The State of Bihar

Dhirendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar @ Shibu Vs The State of Bihar