Allowed¶20

Mohammed Khursid @ Munna v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Aug 2025CR. MISC./47055/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.47055 of 2025 (decided 04-08-2025, oral order by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh): regular bail allowed under Sections 326(g) and 3(5) BNS; Islampur P.S. Case No. 66 of 2025, District Nalanda; allegation of mischief by fire to informant's garage; petitioner merely suspected; clean antecedent; custody since 09.03.2025; bail bond Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of like amount.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner Mohammed Khursid @ Munna enlarged on bail in connection with Islampur P.S. Case No. 66 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. ¶20

Mohammed Khursid @ Munna Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47055 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2025 Thana- ISLAMPUR District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mohammed Khursid @ Munna, S/o Late Satar, R/o village Mohall - Usman Bag, ward no 21, P.S.- Islampur, Dist- Nalanda

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 04-08-2025

¶14

Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel

¶15

for the petitioner and Mr. Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, learned APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Islampur P. S. Case No. 66 of 2025, dated 06.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 326(g) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

¶17

The main submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel are that mischief was caused to the garage of the informant by fire and the petitioner has been merely suspected by the informant of being involved in the commission of the alleged mischief. It is further submitted that the petitioner has fair and clean antecedent and has been languishing in jail since 09.03.2025.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47055 of 2025(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/2

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel and mainly the basis of allegation made by the informant against the petitioner and coupled with petitioner' fair and clean antecedent as well as his custody period, this court is inclined to release him on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above, be enlarged on bail in connection with Islampur P. S. Case No. 66 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

¶21

(Shailendra Singh, J)

¶22

Rajiv/-

¶23

U T

Mohammed Khursid @ Munna v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Khursid @ Munna v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Monu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar @ Manish Paswan @ Monu @ Mannu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Tejan Rai @ Tejnarayan Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Dhirendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar @ Shibu Vs The State of Bihar

Sujit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar