Brajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 12-11-2025 Heard the parties.

¶12

Notice as issued by this Court to OP

¶13

No. 2 refused to accept.

¶14

Considering the aforesaid, notice

¶15

issued by this Court deemed served validly served upon.

¶16

The petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶17

and apprehending his arrest in connection with Sheohar Mahila P.S. Case No. 09 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 316(2), 318(2), 352, 351(2), 79, 3(5) of BNS.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43724 of 2025(3) dt.12-11-2025 2/4

¶19

The allegation against petitioner is to cheat informant who is none but the wife for cash of Rs. 3 lakh and also her jewelry for construction of house and when he failed to return the same to informant on demand she was further threatened to make her video viral on social media platform. It is also alleged that petitioner was in process to solemnize second marriage.

¶20

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the implications alleged due to matrimonial dispute between the parties where admittedly petitioner is husband of the informant and dispute occurred due to certain cash transaction between them which was given to petitioner for construction of their house. It is submitted that allegation qua solemnizing second marriage is completely unfounded and just to aggravate allegation. While concluding arguments, it is submitted that petitioner is a

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43724 of 2025(3) dt.12-11-2025 3/4

¶22

man of clean antecedent.

¶23

Learned APP opposes the prayer of

¶24

bail.

¶25

In view of aforesaid factual

¶26

submission and by taking note of fact as the dispute prima-facie appears surfaced between the parties out of monetary transaction where petitioner is the husband of the informant, accordingly petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Sheohar/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Sheohar Mahila P.S. Case No. 09 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482(2) of BNSS.

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43724 of 2025(3) dt.12-11-2025 4/4

¶28

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶29

Sudha/-

¶30

U T

Brajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Imran Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Mohan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mahadeo Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Baidnath Singh @ Baijnath Singh Vs The State of Bihar