Baidnath Singh @ Baijnath Singh Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41660 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-292 Year-2024 Thana- GORIAKOTHI District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Baidnath Singh @ Baijnath Singh Son Of Late Ramashish Singh Resident Of Village- Dudhra, P.S. Goria Kothi, District -Siwan.

¶5

Bhrigunath Singh Son Of Late Ramashish Singh Resident Of VillageDudhra, P.S. Goria Kothi, District -Siwan.

¶6

Ramawati Devi Wife Of Bhrigunath Singh Resident Of Village- Dudhra, P.S. Goria Kothi, District -Siwan.

¶7

Chanda Devi Wife Of Ajit Kumar Resident Of Village- Chakia Saran, P.S. -Panapur, District -Saran At Chapra.

¶8

Puja Kumari @ Puja Devi Wife Of Mukesh Kumar Singh Resident Of Village- Kusahar, P.S. -Sidhwalia, District -Gopalganj

¶9

... ... Petitioner/s

¶10

Versus

¶11

The State of Bihar

¶12

Khushi Kumari D/O-Rajkumar Sah Resident Of Village -Bhithi, P.S. -Goria Kothi, District -Siwan

¶13

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arbind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA

¶15

ORAL ORDER

¶16

3 12-11-2025 Heard the parties.

¶17

2.The petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and

¶18

apprehending their arrest in connection with Goriakothi

¶19

P.S. Case No. 292 of 2024 registered for the offences

¶20

punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 64,

¶21

303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of BNS.

¶22

As per FIR, son of petitioner no. 2 and 3

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41660 of 2025(3) dt.12-11-2025 2/3

¶24

namely, Hareram Singh was in love with informant and he established physical relation with her on false pretext of marriage.

¶25

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that implications of petitioners with present case is only for the reason that they are parents and immediate family members of accused Hareram Singh with whom informant was in live-inrelation. It is submitted that thrust of allegation is available against Hareram Singh. While concluding arguments, it is submitted that all above named

¶26

petitioners claimed clean antecedents.

¶27

5 Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

¶28

In view of aforesaid factual submission and

¶29

by taking note of fact as thrust of allegation prima-facie

¶30

appears available against Hareram Singh, where implication of above-named petitioners prima-facie appears out of their relation with co-accused Hareram Singh with whom informant was in relation, accordingly

¶31

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41660 of 2025(3) dt.12-11-2025 3/3

¶32

all above-named five petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period

¶33

of four weeks, are directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Siwan/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Goriakothi P.S. Case No. 292 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS.

¶34

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶35

Sudha/-

¶36

U T

Baidnath Singh @ Baijnath Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baidnath Singh @ Baijnath Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Imran Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Mohan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mahadeo Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Brajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar