Ram Pravesh Kumar @ Ram Prabhash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42341 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhepura

======================================================

Ram Pravesh Kumar @ Ram Prabhash Yadav S/o- Yogendra Yadav @ Yogi Yadav Village- Guariya Ward No-13 PS- Kumar Khand Distt- Madhepura

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Kundan Mandal S/o- Late Bindeshwari Mandal Village- Miran W.No-11, Gram Panchayat, Esraeen Baila Thana Srinagar Dist- Madhepura

¶9

... ... Opposite Partys

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanghamitra Ghosh, Advocate : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶12

6 12-12-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 65, 127(2) of B.N.S. and Section 4 of the POCSO Act.

¶15

The allegation in the first information report is that the minor daughter of the informant was taken away by Ram Pravesh Kumar (petitioner) into bush, who committed rape upon her by threatening her on the point of knife.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim was subjected to medical examination and the report of the victim girl would show that her age is in between 17 to 19 years. It would further appear from the medical report that neither any injury was found on any private part of the body nor spermatozoa was found in vaginal swab. It is further

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42341 of 2025(6) dt.12-12-2025 2/2

¶18

submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and no such incident had taken place. The petitioner is in custody since 07.10.2024 and there is no likelihood of the trial to be concluded in near future.

¶19

Learned APP for the State opposed the grant of bail on the ground that the offence is heinous one and the victim in her statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. has totally supported the case of rape as against the petitioner.

¶20

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and considering the fact that the allegation relates to committing rape upon a minor daughter of the informant which stands supported by the statement of the victim girl under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S.S. and further considering the seriousness and gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

¶21

Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is rejected in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.32 of 2024.

¶22

(Soni Shrivastava, J)

Ram Pravesh Kumar @ Ram Prabhash Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Pravesh Kumar @ Ram Prabhash Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudama Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Sujit Kumar Rai @ Sujit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Mandal @ Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kishundev Mukhiya @ Kishundev Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Shushil Kumar @ Sushil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Santosh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar