Allowed¶6

Binay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Feb 2025CR. MISC./4055/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.4055 of 2025; Binay Yadav v. The State of Bihar; regular bail; Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Ss.30(a), 32(3); Sherghati Excise P.S. Case No. 235 of 2024; District Gaya; 45 litres illicit country-made liquor recovered from motorcycle; petitioner in custody since 03.12.2024; bail-bond Rs.20,000 with two sureties of like amount; decided 25-02-2025; Chandra Prakash Singh, J.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Gaya, in connection with Sherghati Excise P.S. Case No. 235 of 2024. ¶6

Binay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4055 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2024 Thana- EXCISE SHERGHATI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Binay Yadav S/O Indradev Yadav R/O Vill.- Jabra, P.S.- Hunterganj, Dist.Chatra, Jharkhand.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Patna

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 25-02-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P for the State.

¶15

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sherghati Excise P.S. Case No. 235 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) and 32(3) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

3 . As per the prosecution case, total 45 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered from the motorcycle.

¶17

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not the owner of the said seized vehicle. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4055 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2025 2/2

¶19

the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 03.12.2024.

¶20

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner and the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya in connection with Sherghati Excise P.S. Case No. 235 of 2024.

¶22

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

Jyoti/-

¶25

U T

Binay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Binay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Paswan @ Sunil Ku. Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Prasad @ Arun yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sudil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Birju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Chaudhary @ Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar