Allowed¶21

Sudil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Feb 2025CR. MISC./4048/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sudil Kumar v. The State of Bihar; Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.4048 of 2025, decided 25-02-2025 by Chandra Prakash Singh, J. Regular bail application under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act arising from Sugauli P.S. Case No. 502/2024 dated 14.11.2024, East Champaran; alleged recovery of 40 litres of illicit country-made liquor from a motorcycle; petitioner in custody since 15.11.2024; bail granted on bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 502/2024. ¶21

Sudil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4048 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-502 Year-2024 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran

¶3

====================================================== Sudil Kumar Son of Dholan Sahani Resident of Village - Mehwa, P.S. - Sugauli, District - East Champaran, Motihari

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmanand Prasad ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 25-02-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 502/2024 dated 14.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, total 40 litres of illicit country-made liquor was recovered from the motorcycle.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not the owner of the said motorcycle. The petitioner has no concern with the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4048 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2025 2/2

¶18

alleged recovery. The petitioner has two antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 15.11.2024.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 502/2024.

¶21

The application stands allowed.

¶22

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶23

atul/-

¶24

U T

Sudil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Paswan @ Sunil Ku. Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Prasad @ Arun yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Birju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Chaudhary @ Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Binay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar