Dismissed¶20

Kundan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Aug 2025CR. MISC./37445/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail refused — Kundan Kumar v. The State of Bihar; Patna High Court CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37445 of 2025; arises out of Rosera P.S. Case No. 291 of 2024, District Samastipur; offences under BNS Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and Section 27 Arms Act; oral order dated 13-08-2025 by Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra; petitioner in custody since 28.11.2024; alleged firing on informant's husband causing grievous injury with medical corroboration urged by State counsel; petitioner's counsel cited land-dispute frame-up and no recovery; bail petition dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on behalf of the parties, the Court was not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner and dismissed the bail petition. ¶20

Kundan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37445 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2024 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kundan Kumar, S/O Ramesh Yadav, R/O Village- Sahiyar Burj, P.S.- Rosera, Distt.- Samatipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 13-08-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 291 of 2024 for the offences registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶15

As per prosecution case, four miscreants came at the house of the informant and started abusing and on protest they started firing and Kundan Kumar (petitioner) shot upon the husband of the informant and fled away.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to land dispute. No any incriminating article has been recovered from possession of the petitioner. Petitioner

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37445 of 2025(3) dt.13-08-2025 2/2

¶18

is in custody since 28.11.2024 having no criminal antecedent.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State vehemently opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submits that the medical report corroborated the allegation made against the petitioner. There is direct allegation against the petitioner that he has fired on the victim causing grievous injury to him, therefore, the bail petition of the petitioner is liable to be rejected at this stage.

¶20

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made on behalf of the parties, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the bail petition of the petitioner is dismissed.

¶21

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

¶22

khushbu/-

Kundan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kundan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Mahto @ Bijay Mahto Vs State of Bihar

Chandra Kishore Rajak Vs The State of Bihar

Amarjeet Kumar @ Amarjeet Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Sarswati Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Singh @ Vikash Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Thako Yadav @ Thakko Yadav Vs The State of Bihar