Allowed¶20

Sarswati Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Aug 2025CR. MISC./35613/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No. 35613 of 2025; Sarswati Devi v. State of Bihar; regular bail granted; Sections 304B, 201, 34 IPC; dowry death; Sessions Trial No. 597A of 2009; Muffasil P.S. Case No. 129 of 2008; Munger; custody since 26.04.2025; charge framed; bail bond Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties; Additional Sessions Judge-III Munger; Sunil Dutta Mishra J.; 13-08-2025.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on regular bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Munger in connection with Sessions Trial No. 597A of 2009, arising out of Muffasil P.S. Case No. 129 of 2008. ¶20

Sarswati Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35613 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2008 Thana- MUNGER MUFFASIL District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sarswati Devi W/o late Chhutaharu Paswan @ Shyam Sunder Paswan R/o Village- Harpur Bak, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Munger

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rounak Kumar Singh Pankaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 13-08-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 597A of 2009, arising out of Muffasil P.S. Case No. 129 of 2008 for the offences registered under Sections 304B, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, daughter of the informant was killed by her husband and mother-in-law (Petitioner).

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to being mother-in-law. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner is an old lady aged about 66 years having clean antecedent. She is in custody since

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35613 of 2025(3) dt.13-08-2025 2/2

¶18

26.04.2025. Charge has already been framed. There is no chance of tampering with the evidence. Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties and facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, named above, be enlarged on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Munger in connection with Sessions Trial No. 597A of 2009, arising out of Muffasil P.S. Case No. 129 of 2008.

¶21

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

¶22

rakhi/-

¶23

U T

Sarswati Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarswati Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Mahto @ Bijay Mahto Vs State of Bihar

Chandra Kishore Rajak Vs The State of Bihar

Amarjeet Kumar @ Amarjeet Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Singh @ Vikash Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Thako Yadav @ Thakko Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar