Rakesh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33574 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2024 Thana- PARSA District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rakesh Ram S/o Yogendra Ram @ Yogindra Ram R/O Vill.- Bankurwa, P.S.Parsa, Dist.- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the State : Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP For the Informant : Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocate ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

6 13-08-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

¶13

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 307 of 2024 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 115, 118(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of B.N.S.

¶14

As per prosecution case, at the instigation of coaccused Dilip Ram, petitioner gave a spade blow on the head of the informant causing its fracture. When the brother of the informant intervened, he was also assaulted. The occurrence took place in the background of land dispute.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33574 of 2025(6) dt.13-08-2025 2/3

¶17

petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the informant with spade but the injury has been caused by hard and blunt substance. The motive behind the occurrence is completely lacking. Learned counsel further submits that there is no repetition of blow and petitioner has no intention to cause death of the informant. The petitioner is in custody since 23.01.2025 and charge sheet has been submitted. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

¶18

Learned APP as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant vehemently oppose the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the grievous injury has been caused by this petitioner with a spade.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the period of custody of the petitioner, his clean antecedent and submission of charge sheet, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions JudgeXVII, Saran at Chapra/concerned Court in connection with

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33574 of 2025(6) dt.13-08-2025 3/3

¶21

Parsa P.S. Case No. 307 of 2024, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of B.N.S.S. and also the following conditions:

¶22

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶23

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶24

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶25

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶26

DKS/-

¶27

U T

Rakesh Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopi Gujarati Vs The State of Bihar

Suman Kumar @ Suman Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Guru Prasad Karmarkar @ Guru Prasad Karmakar Vs The State of Bihar

Durga Bhagat Vs The State of Bihar

Mani Bhusan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Dawloo Vs The State of Bihar