Allowed¶20

Md. Shah Quamar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Aug 2025CR. MISC./28991/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, CR. MISC. No.28991 of 2025, decided 06-08-2025, Satyavrat Verma, J. Bail granted; IPC Sections 420, 409, 467, 468, 34; Jokihat P.S. Case No.166/2022, District Araria; petitioner not named in FIR; custody since 15.02.2025; enquiry into Pradhanmantri Awas Yojna irregularities; parity with named co-accused granted bail (Cr. Misc. No.17268/2024 dt. 14.03.2024; Cr. Misc. No.79548/2023 dt. 11.12.2023); bail bonds Rs.10,000/- with two like sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the petitioner on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court, in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No.166/2022. ¶20

Md. Shah Quamar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28991 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2022 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Shah Quamar Son of Md. Qumruzzama Resident of- Kharhiya Basti, Ward No. 11, P.S.- Araria, District- Araria

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Kumari, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 06-08-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 409, 467, 468 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and is in custody since 15.02.2025. It is next submitted that in light of complaint received regarding irregularities committed in connection with Pradhanmantri Awas Yojna an enquiry was conducted and it was found irregularity was committed complicity of named accused transpired.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28991 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/2

¶17

petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is further submitted that named accused persons have been granted bail by an order dated 14.03.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.17268/2024 (Md. Tarique Anwar @ Tarique Anwar Vs. the State of Bihar) and by order dated 11.12.2023 in Cr. Misc. No.79548/2023 (Belal @ Mohammad Belal Vs. the State of Bihar), as such it is submitted that the case of the petitioner is on better footing.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the

¶19

petitioner.

¶20

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No.166/2022.

¶21

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶22

amit/-

¶23

U T

Md. Shah Quamar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Shah Quamar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Kaushlendra Narayan Alias Koushlendra Narayan Vs The State of Bihar

Kishori Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Jabeer Vs The State of Bihar

Puja Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Sharma @ Tannu Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar