Allowed

Prince Kumar @ Prince v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 May 2025CR. MISC./28776/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in an assault case where he allegedly attacked the informant with an iron rod, causing simple injuries. Court allowed bail on arrest or surrender within four weeks with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted: bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two like sureties upon arrest/surrender within four weeks, subject to S.438(2) CrPC conditions.

Prince Kumar @ Prince Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28776 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-242 Year-2022 Thana- KHODAWANDPUR District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Prince Kumar @ Prince Son of vivek Kumar @ Vivek Sahu R/O- Aijani PSChhaurahi, District- Begusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mohammed Arif, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 07-05-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Khodawandpur (Chhaurahi) P.S. Case No. 242 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 326, 354(B), 379, 34, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per allegation, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant and her husband.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. The allegation of inflicting rod blow on head of the husband of

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28776 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 2/2

¶18

the informant is on co-accused, Vivek Sahu whereas the allegation against the present petitioner is concerned, there is allegation that he assaulted the informant with iron rod. The injuries suffered by the informant are simple in nature and the petitioner is a person of clean antecedent.

¶19

On the other hand, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Manjhaul, Begusarai in connection with Khodawandpur (Chhaurahi) P.S. Case No. 242 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶22

Neha/-

¶23

U T

Prince Kumar @ Prince v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prince Kumar @ Prince v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Tilak Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Gupta @ Manoj Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Sushil Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shahjahan Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Durgesh Paswan @ Durgesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar