Allowed

Sushil Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 May 2025CR. MISC./26722/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought bail in a case involving recovery of a country-made pistol and a live cartridge from him during a police operation. Considering the facts and circumstances, the court granted regular bail on furnishing bail bonds with two sureties, conditioned on cooperation with the trial.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with Rs. 10,000 bail bond and two sureties of like amount to ACJM-III, Jhanjharpur, with condition to cooperate with trial.

Sushil Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26722 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2024 Thana- MADHEPUR District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUSHIL KUMAR YADAV S/O Ram Chandra Yadav R/O Vill.- Birpur, P.S.Madhepur, Dist.- Madhubani

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Patna

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jaishankar Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmanand Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 05-05-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections-310(4), 310(5) of BNS, 2023 and 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act.

¶15

Allegedly, on the tip off, the informant with other police personnel proceeded to the place of occurrence where three boys having seen the police started to flee away but one boy, i.e. the petitioner was apprehended and on search, one country made pistol and a live cartridge was recovered from his pocket.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26722 of 2025(2) dt.05-05-2025 2/2

¶18

in this case. The petitioner is under incarceration since 05-112024.

¶19

Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Jhanjharpur (Madhubani) in connection with Madhepur P.S. Case No. 170 of 2024 with condition that the petitioner shall cooperated with the trial of the case and make himself available as and when required by the court.

¶21

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶22

A.K.V.//-

¶23

U T

Sushil Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushil Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Parwez Vs The State of Bihar

Naresh Yadav @ Naresh Kumar Yadav @ Naresh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Budhan Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Tilak Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Gupta @ Manoj Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Ray @ Santosh Kumar Roy Vs The State of Bihar