Allowed¶19

Prince Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 May 2025CR. MISC./27355/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail granted; Arms Act S.25(1-B)(a), 26, 35; country made katta and two live cartridges seized; Danapur P.S. Case No. 1081 of 2024; custody since 01.11.2024; charge-sheet filed; bail bond Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties; A.C.J.M-I Danapur Patna; Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27355 of 2025; Justice Arvind Singh Chandel; decided 06-05-2025.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 1081 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M - I, Danapur, Patna. ¶19

Prince Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27355 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1081 Year-2024 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Prince Kumar Son of Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Sinha R/o Sultanpur, Devi Chaura Gali, Ward No.- 17, P.S.- Danapur, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 06-05-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel appearing for the respondent-State.

¶13

It is the first regular bail application submitted by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 1081 of 2024 for the alleged offences punishable under Section 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶14

According to the case of prosecution, on 30.10.2024, during patrolling the police party caught hold the present applicant along with two other accused persons. On being searched, one country made katta and two live cartridges were seized from the possession of the present applicant and thereafter they were arrested.

¶15

It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner herein is innocent and is falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.11.2024, the charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take some time therefore, he

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27355 of 2025(2) dt.06-05-2025 2/2

¶17

prays that the petitioner may be granted benefit of bail.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondentState opposes the prayer of bail.

¶19

Considering the submission made by the counsels and further considering the detention period of the applicant without commenting on the other merits of the case. I am of the view that the present applicant should be granted the benefit of bail. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 1081 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties, to the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M – I, Danapur, Patna.

¶20

(Arvind Singh Chandel , J)

¶21

Siddharth Soni/-

¶22

U T

Prince Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prince Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pannalal Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Vivek Kumar @ Vivek Yadav @ Swami Vivekanand Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Kumar @ Ramashankar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Inardev Ram @ Pappu Ram @ Indeo Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Yadav @ Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar