nowhere suggests that it was recovered from the conscious physical possession of this petitioner by following mandatory provision of law as available under N.D.P.S. Act qua search, sealing and sampling. It is submitted that as per FSL report one of the composition of contraband was found paracetamol which is used in treatment of fever, whereas it is conceded that one of the composition was mono acetyl morphine which is a narcotic substance. It is submitted that in any way quantity of seized contraband cannot be said to be more than the commercial quantity as same is not the case of prosecution also. It is also submitted that two similarly situated co-accused persons namely Vijay Kumar and Kanhaiya Kumar were granted bail by one of the learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court through Cr. Misc. No. 81974 of 2024 dated 25.03.2025 & Cr. Misc. No. 76938 of 2024 dated 25.03.2025, respectively. It is also submitted that as quantity of contraband prima-facie appears less than commercial quantity, therefore, import of rigorous provision as available under Section 37 of the NDPS Act not appears applicable in the present case. While concluding the argument it is submitted that petitioner found involved in six more criminal cases,
