Dismissed¶23

Mohan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jul 2025CR. MISC./12223/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail rejected; murder of informant's husband; specific allegation of opening fire; Sections 302, 34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act; Suppl. Khagaria P.S. Case No. 80/2013; named in FIR; custody since 14.05.2024; absconding for 12 years; apprehended 2024; three criminal antecedents; informant is eye-witness; trial to be concluded preferably within one year; Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.12223 of 2025; Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.

What did the court decide?

Bail rejected; ancillary direction issued to the learned trial court to expedite the trial and conclude it preferably within one year. ¶23

Mohan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12223 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2013 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mohan Yadav S/O Late Rajendra Yadav, R/O Village- Kallar Tola, P.S.Muffasil, Dist.- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

======================================================

¶9

Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prem Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶13

5 24-07-2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Suppl. Khagaria P.S. Case No. 80/2013 registered for the offence under Sections 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶16

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 14.05.2024.

¶17

Allegation against petitioner is to commit murder of husband of the informant alongwith other named coaccused persons.

¶18

Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner implicated with present case due to previous enmity and same is evident from the fact

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12223 of 2025(5) dt.24-07-2025 2/3

¶20

that no specific time of occurrence appears mentioned in the FIR. It is further pointed out that investigation of this case is already completed and as such, there is no chances of tempering with evidence. While concluding argument, it is submitted that petitioner found involved in three more criminal cases, where he is on bail.

¶21

Learned APP while opposing the prayer of bail submitted that the petitioner after the occurrence was absconding for long 12 years and was apprehended only in year 2024. It is submitted that petitioner is facing specific allegation as to commit murder of husband of the informant, who is the eye-witness of the occurrence and, moreover, petitioner found involved in three heinous offences.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid factual submission and

¶23

by taking note of fact as allegation to open fire is specific against this petitioner, which caused death of the husband of the informant, coupled with the fact that petitioner was absconding for long 12 years and having three criminal antecedents, accordingly, prayer of bail of petitioner is rejected herewith for the present.

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12223 of 2025(5) dt.24-07-2025 3/3

¶25