further submitted that even the order impugned records that charges have been framed but then the date on which charges were framed is not recorded, it is next submitted that the order by which charges were framed was not annexed with the bail application and at para-14, it was pleaded that after submission of charge sheet, cognizance for offence was taken and by now charges against the petitioner was framed on, as such, the date of framing of charge was also not pleaded in the instant bail application, hence the Court had directed for filing a supplementary affidavit bringing on record the order by which charges have been framed. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a second supplementary affidavit has been filed on 29.04.2025, wherein the order framing charge has been annexed. The second supplementary affidavit is not on record but the learned APP submits that the copy of second supplementary affidavit has been served on him and from perusal of the same, it manifests that order framing charge has not been annexed rather an information was sought under the RTI Act with regard to framing of charge and a reply was given that charges have been framed on 09.01.2025. The learned APP submits that it absolutely does not stand to reason that if charges have been framed against the petitioner on 09.01.2025, then
