Disposed¶19

Vinay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 May 2025CR. MISC./23064/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail disposed in terms of Naushad Ansari order; Section 420 IPC; Section 41(1)(b) CrPC; Chhapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 836 of 2022; Saran; Vinay Kumar v. State of Bihar; Criminal Miscellaneous No. 23064 of 2025; order dt. 01-05-2025; Satyavrat Verma J; representation to SP/IO within three weeks; Patna High Court.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar); petitioner permitted to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and Investigating Officer within three weeks with a web copy of that order. ¶19

Vinay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶19

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner should be granted anticipatory bail in connection with Chhapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 836 of 2022 for offences punishable under Section 420 IPC. +1 more

¶13

Ratio / Principle

The anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar), and is not decided on merits.

¶19

Key takeaways

The petitioner is at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case within three weeks, with a web copy of the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).ratio¶20
The concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the directions contained in the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).ratio¶20

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Patna High Court (Satyavrat Verma, J.), Criminal Miscellaneous No. 23064 of 2025, oral order dated 01-05-2025 — Anticipatory bail: Vinay Kumar sought anticipatory bail in Chhapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 836 of 2022 (Section 420 IPC), an offence stated to carry punishment of seven years and less; investigation was continuing and the petitioner had not been granted the benefit of Section 41(1)(b) CrPC. On the learned APP's submission, undisputed by petitioner's counsel, the application was disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar) rather than decided on merits. The petitioner was given liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer within three weeks with a web copy of that order, and the SP was directed to ensure the Investigating Officer strictly adhered to its directions. Bail neither granted nor refused on merits; no monetary relief involved.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23064 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-836 Year-2022 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vinay Kumar Son of Gautam Prasad Resident of Village and Post Office - Bazar Samiti Sadha, P.S. - Muffasil, District - Saran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ankit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 01-05-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Chhapra Muffasil P. S. Case No.836 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Section 420 of the I.P.C.

¶14

The learned APP submits that the offence for which

¶15

the instant FIR has been instituted, carries punishment of seven years and less, the said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that investigation in the case against the petitioner is still continuing, but then, the petitioner has not been granted the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23064 of 2025(2) dt.01-05-2025 2/2

¶18

benefit of Section 41(1)(b) of the Cr.P.C, on which the learned APP submits that the case be disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).

¶19

In view of the submission made by the learned APP, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).

¶20

The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case, within a period of three weeks from today, with a web copy of the order dated 132-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the state of Bihar); and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the directions contained in the order dated 132-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).

¶21

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶22

vikash/-

¶23

U T

Vinay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niraj Ray @ Neeraj Ray @ Niraj Kumar Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Shatrughan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Vivek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mangaldeo Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Rawat Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar