Petitioner sought regular bail in a case involving possession of pistols and threats under the Arms Act. Bench noted petitioner's criminal antecedents and rejection of alibi. Bail application was dismissed.
Bail application rejected; petitioner advised to renew prayer after six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17536 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-545 Year-2024 Thana- SITAMARHI District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
Avanish Anand @ Abhay Paswan @ Abhay S/o Shree Tej Narayan Paswan@ Teja Paswan Resident of village- Panthpakar, P.s- Bathnaha, DistrictSitamarhi
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dwij Raj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
3 12-05-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17536 of 2025(3) dt.12-05-2025 2/2
building. The room was reportedly used by co-accused Sanjiv Kumar, Ritesh Kumar, an unknown computer operator, along with the petitioner and one Harendra Paswan for criminal activities.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in connection with offences under the Arms Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Avanish Anand @ Abhay Paswan
The State of Bihar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
