Application for bail in connection with a case involving assault resulting in death. Court rejected the application due to serious allegations of inflicting fatal injury.
The bail application is rejected. The petitioner does not deserve the privilege of bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16039 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2024 Thana- SANGRAMPUR District- East
Champaran
====================================================== Navlesh Thakur @ Naulesh Thakur Son of Late Lalan Thakur Resident of Village - Sangrampur Mathiya, P.S. - Sangrampur, District- East Champaran at Motihari
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashank Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.N. Thakur For the Informant : Mr. Madhurendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
3 21-11-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16039 of 2025(3) dt.21-11-2025 2/2
the present case. The petitioner is in incarceration since 26.09.2024.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
priyanka/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves bail given the fatal injuries alleged to have been inflicted by him.
Whether the allegations of falsely implicating the petitioner justify the grant of bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Navlesh Thakur @ Naulesh Thakur
The State of Bihar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
