Allowed¶22

Pannalal v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Jul 2025CR. MISC./14081/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail granted under S. 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; illicit liquor case; 11793.6 litres illicit Crazy Romeo wine recovered from truck; petitioner owner of vehicle; no conscious possession alleged; one prior criminal case ended in acquittal; custody since 10.09.2024; bail-bond Rs.20,000 with two sureties; Dehri Town P.S. Case No. 886 of 2019; Rohtas at Sasaram; Criminal Miscellaneous No.14081 of 2025; Patna High Court; Justice Chandra Prakash Singh; order dated 28-07-2025.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted: petitioner to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Dehri (T) P.S. Case No. 886 of 2019. ¶22

Pannalal Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14081 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-886 Year-2019 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pannalal Son of Vasudev R/o Village- Virampur, P.O.- Kakralwali, P.S.Kotwali Dehat, District - Etah (U.P.)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Patna

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Lalan Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 28-07-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P for the State.

¶15

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Dehri (T) P.S. Case No. 886 of 2019 dated 16.02.2019 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

As per the prosecution case, total 11793.6 litres of illicit Crazy Romeo wine was recovered from the truck.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is the owner of the said vehicle. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14081 of 2025(2) dt.28-07-2025 2/2

¶19

The petitioner has one criminal antecedent in which he has been acquitted as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 10.09.2024.

¶20

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Dehri (T) P.S. Case No. 886 of 2019.

¶22

The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

guddukr/-

¶25

U T

Pannalal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pannalal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pintu Chaudhary @ Pintu Kumar Chaudhar Vs the State of Bihar

Yogendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anup Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ravina Devi Vs The State of Bihar