Yogendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Priya, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 25-07-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 03 of 2025 dated 06.01.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, total 80 litres of illicit country-made liquor was recovered from the two sacks along with motorcycle.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The said motorcycle does not

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37778 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025 2/3

¶17

belong to the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 21.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10776 of 2025. Learned counsel has submitted that no case is made out against the petitioner. Learned Counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar 2019 (2) PLJR 1089 . The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.

¶18

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case.

¶19

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the material available on record, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37778 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025 3/3

¶21

within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/(Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Bhojpur in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 03 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

¶22

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

shivam/-

¶25

U T

Yogendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalita Kumari @ Lalita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Kalim Miya @ Md. Kalim Khan @ Md. Kalim Vs The State of Bihar

Manjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pintu Chaudhary @ Pintu Kumar Chaudhar Vs the State of Bihar

Bittu Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Paswan Vs The State of Bihar