Petitioners sought to withdraw their criminal miscellaneous application with liberty to raise all grounds at the stage of framing of charge. The High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn with that liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12125 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2021 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S. K. Lal, Sr. Advocate Mr.Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the State : Mr.Mukeshwar Dayal, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
counsel for the petitioners prays for and is permitted to withdraw this application to raise all the grounds at the stage of framing of charge.
liberty aforesaid.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
P. Kumar U T
Suresh Dass
Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Dass
Raju Kumar @ Raju Dass
Phulpari Devi
The State of Bihar
Aajhaul Devi
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
