Allowed

Arvind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Apr 2025CR. MISC./16364/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application in a case alleging employment obtained on a forged certificate. Noting earlier two verification reports favouring the petitioner while the investigating officer later called the certificates doubtful, the court granted anticipatory bail with conditions including co-operation in trial.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail: release on arrest/surrender within four weeks on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2)/Section 482 BNSS conditions and trial co-operation.

Arvind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16364 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-470 Year-2024 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Arvind Kumar S/o- Yogendra Prasad Yadav R/o Village- Rampur Mangua, P.S- Saraiya, Dist. Muzaffarpur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinay Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Mishra ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 02-04-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 470 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that the petitioner has got job on the basis of forged certificate.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier two reports regarding the verification of certificates of the petitioner are in favour of the petitioner but during investigation, the I.O. has reported that certificates of the petitioner are doubtful. He further submits that the I.O. without going through the earlier two reports has said that the earlier

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16364 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/2

¶17

reports were doubtful.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts, this application

¶19

is allowed.

¶20

Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur/concerned Court below in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 470 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.

¶21

As a condition of this order, the petitioner, after being released on anticipatory bail, is directed to co-operate in the trial either by appearing personally or through his lawyer in the concerned Court below on the dates fixed in the trial. Noncompliance of the condition will result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶22

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶23

Vikas/-

¶24

Arvind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babban @ Babban Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Brahmadev Yadav @ Dharmdev Kumar@ Dharmendra kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ajit Yadav @ Ajit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajdeo Ravidas Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Chauhan @ Mukesh Prasad Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Dukhan Yadav @ Bijendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar