Dismissed¶23

Nazrul @ Najrul Haque v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Sept 2025CR. APP (SJ)/2250/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail refusal appeal rejected; appeal under Section 14-A(2) SC/ST Act 1989; charges: Sections 140(1), 103(1), 238, 61(2) BNS 2023 read with Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act; Supplementary Garbandanga P.S. Case No. 37 of 2024, Kishanganj; informant's son killed, body on national highway (09.11.2024); FIR on suspicion against Batasi Devi and Galib Sadan; custodial confessional chain Batasi Devi to Rahid Alam to appellant; counsel: Ram Prawesh Kumar (appellant), Sadanand Paswan Spl. PP (State); impugned order 07.05.2025 by 1st Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Kishanganj; Satyavrat Verma J; decided 04-09-2025.

What did the court decide?

Considering the submissions made by the learned Special P.P. for the State, the Court was not inclined to entertain the appeal against refusal of anticipatory bail. ¶22

Nazrul @ Najrul Haque Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2250 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2024 Thana- GARVANDANGA District- Kishanganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Nazrul @ Najrul Haque S/O Hirajul Resident of Village- Hamla, P.SPowakhali ,District- Kishanganj

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Manda Devi Wife of Jitu Lal Rai Resident of Village- Malingaon, P.SPowakhali, Dist- Kishanganj.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl. PP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 04-09-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned

¶14

Spl. P.P. for the State.

¶15

This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “SC/ST Act”) against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail vide order dated 07.05.2025 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Kishanganj in connection with Supplementary Garbandanga P.S. Case No. 37 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 140(1), 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the BNS, 2023 read with Sections 3(2) (v) of the SC/ST Act.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2250 of 2025(3) dt.04-09-2025 2/3

¶17

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that her son was married to Batasi Devi who developed illicit relationship with one Galib Sadan, on account of which she used to threatened his son, it is next alleged that on 09.11.2024, the informant came to know that her son was lying in a pool of blood on the national highway, accordingly, she reached the place of occurrence and the instant FIR came to be instituted wherein based on suspicion, it is alleged that Batasi Devi and Galib Sadan committed the occurrence.

¶18

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant is not named in the FIR. It is further submitted that during the course of investigation, Batasi Devi, the wife of the deceased, was apprehended and in her confessional statement, the name of Rahid Alam transpired and the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of Rahid Alam, it is thus, submitted that confessional statement in police custody does not have any evidentiary value.

¶19

Learned Special P.P. for the State, Mr. Sadanand Paswan, opposes the appeal and submits that that the son of the informant was killed and his body was thrown on the national highway and during the course of investigation, as submitted by

¶20

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2250 of 2025(3) dt.04-09-2025 3/3

¶21

the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, the wife of the deceased was apprehended and based on her disclosure, name of Rahid Alam transpired and Rahid Alam in his confessional statement disclosed the name of the appellant. It is also submitted that investigation is continuing.

¶22

Considering the submissions made by the learned Special PP for the State, the Court is not inclined to entertain the appeal.

¶23

Accordingly, the instant appeal stands rejected.

¶24

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶25

Rishabh/-

¶26

U T

Nazrul @ Najrul Haque v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nazrul @ Najrul Haque v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kunjbihari Prasad @ Kujbihari Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Ghosh @ Kaju Ghosh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Mustafa Ansari @ Md. Mustafa Vs The State of Bihar

Soni Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Paswan @ Bittu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar