Pankaj Kumar Ghosh @ Kaju Ghosh Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sapan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl. P.P. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 03-09-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

¶14

This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “SC/ST Act”) against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail vide order dated 07.04.2025 passed by the learned Court of District Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Katihar in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 24 of 2025 registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 69 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(i)(w)

¶15

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1736 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 2/4

¶16

and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant has antecedent of one case. It is next submitted that the informant alleges that on 20.01.2025 at about 06:00 P.M., her daughter went missing. Thereafter, the informant started searching when she saw the appellant bringing the victim from behind the house of the informant. On seeing the informant and her family members, the appellant fled away. On being questioned, the victim disclosed that six months ago she had gone to the field where she met the appellant and the appellant committed rape. Further, the appellant promised the victim to marry her and thereafter he used to meet the victim. Accordingly, the informant went to the house of the appellant to make a complaint when his family members abused her by taking caste name and refused to marry the appellant with the victim.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the informant alleges that she saw the appellant and the victim coming from behind her house when the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1736 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 3/4

¶20

appellant fled away and the victim disclosed that six months ago she was raped but since the appellant had promised to marry her, the occurrence was not disclosed. It is also submitted that it does not appear probable that had the appellant committed rape of the victim, in that event the victim would not have disclosed the same to the informant or her family members. It is submitted that the relation was purely consensual between two consenting adults and it was only when the informant saw the appellant and the victim together, the present false case came to be instituted. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the informant alleges that she came to the house of the appellant where she was abused and assaulted by his family members but then the occurrence did not take place within public view, nor does the F.I.R. even remotely suggest that the occurrence was witnessed by any independent witnesses. It is further reiterated and submitted that the relationship was consensual and when the same soured, the present false case came to be instituted. It is next submitted that the appellant will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

¶21

Learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposed

¶22

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1736 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 4/4

¶23

the prayer for anticipatory bail but they are not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant that had the appellant committed rape of the victim six months back, in that event the victim would not have failed to disclose the said fact to her parents.

¶24

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, let the appellant, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶25

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.

¶26

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶27

Neha/-

Pankaj Kumar Ghosh @ Kaju Ghosh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Kumar Ghosh @ Kaju Ghosh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Phool Chand Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Kaushal Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Kalawati Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Kunjbihari Prasad @ Kujbihari Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Mustafa Ansari @ Md. Mustafa Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar