Appeal filed with a condonation application for a 616-day delay in preferring the memo of appeal. The court found the delay not satisfactorily explained, rejected the interlocutory application and consequently dismissed the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1713 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-415 Year-2022 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 23-06-2025 I.A. No. 1 of 2025
The interlocutory application 1 of 2025 has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 616 days in preferring the memo of appeal.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1713 of 2025(3) dt.23-06-2025 2/2
quashing the impugned order, which was also barred by limitation, and when that petition was dismissed, the present appeal was filed.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
kundan/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 616-day delay in filing the appeal should be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gayatri Devi @ Gayatri Kumari
Uday Kumar @ Udaya Nand Mandal
Subhodh Kumar @ Subodh Kumar Vishwas
Dhiraj Thakur @ Dheeraj Kumar Thakur
Raju Mandal @ Raju Kumar Mandal
The State of Bihar Patna
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
