Criminal appeal abated on the death of the sole appellant during pendency; the court accepted the police report of death and ordered the records consigned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.266 of 1996
======================================================
Jaggu Singh @ Mukesh Kumar
... ... Appellant/S Versus State Of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Bal Mukund Pd. Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar Sinha, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI)
Police, Beur, Patna in-action with the instant appeal stating inter alia that the sole appellant, namely, Jaggu Singh @ Mukesh Kumar is expired during pendency of the appeal.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Prakashmani/-
U
Jaggu Singh @ Mukesh Kumar
State of Bihar
Bibek Chaudhuri
Dr. Anshuman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
