Suresh Kumar Mahto v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a miscellaneous compliance proceeding challenging a 2022 writ order, the petitioner was unrepresented. The court dropped the contempt application after noting compliance via a show-cause memo, reserving liberty to challenge the compliance order later.
What did the court decide?
The present MJC / contempt application stands dropped reserving liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 18.07.2023.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.571 of 2023 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13541 of 2022
======================================================
Suresh Kumar Mahto Son of Ram Prasad Mahto , Resident of VillageBanauli, P.S.-Simri, District-Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
- The State of Bihar through MIhir Kumar Singh, the Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj Government of Bihar, Patna.
- Dr. Ashok Kumar Ghosh, The Bihar State Pollution Control Board through its Chairman, Patna.
- Sri Rajeev Raushan, The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.
- Chaudhary Basant Kumar Singh, The Circle Officer, Singhwada, Darbhanga.
- Sanju Kumari Wife of Sujit Roy The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Banauli, Singhwada, Darbhanga.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suresh Kumar Mahto
- respondent
The State of Bihar
- respondent
The Bihar State Pollution Control Board
- respondent
District Magistrate, Darbhanga
- respondent
Circle Officer, Singhwada
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court