This Order dismissal maintains a contempt petition filed for alleged non-compliance of a prior order. The court held it was not maintainable.
The present contempt petition was dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2821 of 2019
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.221 of 2006
======================================================
Bageshwar Singh son of Late Chullan Singh resident of Village- Jalalpur, P.S.- Dariyapur, District- Saran (Chapra).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam (Aag12)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
2 27-02-2024 The present MJC is filed for non-compliance of the order dated 19.06.2018 passed in LPA No. 922 of 2015 arising out of CWJC No. 221 of 2006. It is to be noted that petitioner Bageshwar Singh is fifth respondent in the aforementioned LPA and appellant is Shyam Dev Singh . Shyam Dev Singh’ LPA was dismissed. Therefore, there is no specific observation except to the extent that petitioner Bageshwar Singh was fifth respondent. It is ordered that “the right of the respondent no. 5 as a premptor and the nature of land as
Patna High Court MJC No.2821 of 2019(2) dt.27-02-2024 2/2
agriculture has been upheld, nothing has been placed by the appellant which would pursued us form a different view”.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
( Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
vashudha/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present contempt petition is maintainable given the upheld nature of the respondent's rights in the prior order.
Bageshwar Singh
Mr. Deepak Kumar
Mr. C. Ashok Vardhan
Mr. Arun Kumar
Mr. Shambhu Sharan Pandey
Mr. Shiv Ranjan
P. B. BAJANTHRI
ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
