Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case disposed of. The petitioners' husband's services had been approved with retrospective effect. The court noted that while service was accepted, the petitioner claimed certain benefits akin to another individual (Md. Sahabuddin) were denied. The court advised preferring a writ petition for such benefit claims.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.266 of 2024
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10649 of 2016
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Additional Advocate General 13 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
Kuwar Singh University ( Opposite Party No. 2 & 3).
Patna High Court MJC No.266 of 2024(3) dt.05-04-2024 2/2
Mr. Choudhary had provided the copy of the notification no. 362/2024 dated 22.02.2024 issued under the signature of the Registrar of the said University by which amongst other the name of the husband of the petitioner has also been accepted and have been approved w.e.f. 09.07.1950.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
anuradha/-
U
Renu Devi
Roushan Ram
Rohit Kumar
Manshi Kumari
The State of Bihar
Dr. Shailendra Kumar Chaturvedi
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
