Sakaldeo Mukhiya v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner nearly 19 years after the FIR was registered. The court held that granting bail after such a delayed period in the interest of justice was not appropriate.
What did the court decide?
The application for anticipatory bail and the pending criminal miscellaneous petition were rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21318 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2005 Thana- BHIMPUR District- Supaul
======================================================
Sakaldeo Mukhiya S/o Late Sitay Mukhiya R/o ward no. 2, Kala Govindpur, Jiwachhpur, P.S. - Bhimpur, Distt. - Supaul, Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajiv Nayan, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application for anticipatory bail filed 19 years after the FIR should be allowed.
Whether the rejection of the anticipatory bail application in the interest of justice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sakaldeo Mukhiya
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Rajiv Roy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court