Sukh Deo Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Jan 2024MJC/158/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration application (MJC No.158 of 2023) arising out of C.W.J.C. No.3641 of 2015 - Sukh Deo Sah v. The State of Bihar, The District Magistrate Darbhanga, The Circle Officer Bahadurpur and Jagar Nath Sah; writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 06.12.2022 due to non-appearance of counsel on grounds of illness; petition allowed and writ petition restored to its original file; Patna High Court, single bench, Anil Kumar Sinha, J.; decision dated 05-01-2024; no statutes or precedents cited; Darbhanga, Bihar.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of C.W.J.C. no. 3641 of 2015 to its original file. ¶¶23

Sukh Deo Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.158 of 2023

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3641 of 2015

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Sukh Deo Sah Son of Thakur Sah, Resident of Mohalla Pandasarai, Laheriyasarai, Anchal Bahadurpur, Police Station- Laherisarai, District Darbhanga.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

¶10

The Circle Officer, Bahadurpur, Police Station- Laheriasarai, District Darbhanga.

¶11

Jagar Nath Sah Son of Mahabir Sah, Resident of Mohalla- Pandasarai, Laheri Tola, Laheriyasarai, Anchal- Bahadurpur, Police StationLaheriasarai, District Darbhanga.

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhas Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam (AAG 12) ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶16

3 05-01-2024

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned.

¶18

The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. no. 3641 of 2015, which has stood dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 06.12.2022.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 06.12.2022, he could not come to the Court as he was ill, due to which, when the case was called out, he could not attend it.

¶20

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel

¶21

Patna High Court MJC No.158 of 2023(3) dt.05-01-2024 2/2

¶22

for the petitioner as also taking into account the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and appropriate to restore the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. no. 3641 of 2015 to its original file.

¶23

The present petition stands allowed.

¶24

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶25

rinkee/-

¶26

Sukh Deo Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukh Deo Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Vihari Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Sukhlal Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rajendra Prasad Raman and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Indu Bhushan Mandal Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Rinku Kumari Vs The State of Bihar