Civil Review petition dismissed for non-compliance as no petitioner appeared on the hearing date. No legal principles established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.116 of 2017
In
CIVIL REVIEW No.139 of 2015
====================================================== Sheopujan Singh @ Dr. S. P. Singh
... ... Petitioner/s Versus The Union Of India and Ors ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Amitesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
4 14-03-2024 None appears for the petitioner.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
( Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
manish/-
U
Sheopujan Singh @ Dr. S. P. Singh
The Union Of India and Ors
P. B. Bajanthri
Alok Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
