Partition Suit No. 86/2019 as plaintiffs and defendants whereby the parties divided the suit property amongst themselves by entering into the compromise. A large chunk of the suit property belongs to the petitioners of this case, who were not made party before the learned trial court. However, the parties of Title Partition Suit No.86/2019 entered into a fraudulent compromise and a compromise decree was passed which was completely based on fraud and strangers were allowed to have title over properties of the petitioners on the basis of fraudulent compromise decree. The learned senior counsel further submits that the Execution Case No.02 of 2022, which was filed before the court of learned Sub-Judge, 5th , Danapur, Patna for execution of compromise decree by the respondents 1st Set, was not maintainable as it has been admission of the plaintiffs and defendants in their compromise petition that after the property was partitioned and shares were allotted, the parties came into possession of their respective shares of the property, so there was no requirement of filing any execution case. It has also been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that if it is a case of compromise based on inter se settlement of parties, there was no requirement of the respondents seeking help of the court and the police as well as the Magistrate for getting possession since it
