Dismissed¶24

Sujit Kumar Yadav v. Sri Laxman Mahto and Ors.

Patna HC22 Mar 2024C.Misc./643/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; C.Misc. No.643 of 2017; Arun Kumar Jha J.; oral order dated 22-03-2024; petitioner Sujit Kumar Yadav versus Laxman Mahto, Jhapsi Kewat, Vishwanath Singh, Sujeet Kumar, Ramshrya Singh Mahto; dismissal of petition for non-maintainability; failure to implead intervenors allowed to be impleaded by impugned order as respondents; non-compliance with order dated 02.01.2024; last opportunity given on 25.01.2024; no interlocutory application filed.

What did the court decide?

The present petition is not maintainable because the petitioner failed to implead as respondents the intervenors who were allowed to be impleaded by the impugned order; consequently the petition was dismissed. ¶24

Sujit Kumar Yadav Vs Sri Laxman Mahto and Ors. — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.643 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sujit Kumar Yadav S/o- Ramchandra Gope, Resident of Ranipur Paijaba, Patna City, P.S.- Bypass, District- Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

Sri Laxman Mahto S/o- Late Sita Ram Mahto, Resident of MohallaBagampur, P.S.- Chok, Patna, District- Patna.

¶7

Sri Jhapsi Kewat, S/o- Late Madan Kewat, Resident of Mohalla- Ranipur Khirki, P.S.- Khajekala, Patna City, District- Patna.

¶8

Sri Vishwanath Singh, S/o- Late Shaam Singh, Resident of MohallaRanipur Khirki, P.S.- Khajekala, Patna City, District- Patna.

¶9

Sri Sujeet Kumar, S/o- Late Shiyasharan Yadav, Resident of Mohalla- Bari Pahari Patna City, P.S.- Agam Kuan, Alamganj, Patna City, Distirct- Patna.

¶10

Sri Ramshrya Singh Mahto, S/o- Late Shyam Bihari Mahto, Resident of Mohalla- Tulshi Mandi Sri Digamber Jain Mandir Gali Patna City- 7, P.S.Alamganj, Patna City, District- Patna.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA

¶15

ORAL ORDER

¶16

5 22-03-2024 On call, none appears for the petitioner.

¶17

On 25.01.2024 following orders was passed.

¶18

“Mr. Harish Kumar, learned advocate appears and submits that the arguing counsel in this case could not come due to illness.

¶19

Perusal of the record shows order dated 02.01.2024 has not been complied with.

¶20

By way of last opportunity, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to comply the said order within three weeks, failing which the present petition will be dismissed.

¶21

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.643 of 2017(5) dt.22-03-2024 2/2

¶22

List this case on 26.02.2024.”

¶23

Office has reported that no interlocutory application has been filed.

¶24

Since the petitioner has failed to implead the intervenors who were allowed to be impleaded by the impugned order as respondents in the present petition, the present petition is not maintainable and hence, the same is dismissed.

¶25

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶26

Prakash/-

¶27

Sujit Kumar Yadav v. Sri Laxman Mahto and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujit Kumar Yadav v. Sri Laxman Mahto and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna Kumar @ Munna Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Jha @ Rohit Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Paras Prasad and Anr. Vs Satyendra Prasad

Bali Ram Singh Yadav Vs Mira Devi and Anr.

Govind Gaurav Pandey Vs Bhagya Shree