Disposed

Govind Gaurav Pandey v. Bhagya Shree

Patna HC22 Mar 2024C.Misc./1282/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition seeking quashing of a Family Court, Katihar order in a matrimonial case was not pressed after the case was transferred to Family Court, Bhagalpur; petitioner sought only expedited disposal. The High Court disposed of the petition, directing disposal within six months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur to dispose of the pending matrimonial case within six months.

Govind Gaurav Pandey Vs Bhagya Shree — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1282 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Govind Gaurav Pandey, Son of Dinesh Chandra Pandey, resident of Larkania Tola, Ward No. 18, Police Station Post Office-Katihar, District-Kaihar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

Bhagya Shree, D/o Late Achyutanand Singh, Resident of Bhikhanpur Gumti No, Bhagalpur.

¶7

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 22-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner

¶11

for quashing the order dated 03.06.2017 passed by the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Katihar in Matrimonial Case No. 301 of 2016.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been transferred from the Court learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Katihar to the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur Vide order dated 31.08.2022 passed in MJC No. 3976 of 2019 by this Court. Learned counsel further submits that he do not want to press his petition so far as relief made in the petition is concerned and would confine himself for issuance of directions to the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur to dispose of the case

¶13

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1282 of 2017(4) dt.22-03-2024 2/2

¶14

before it as expeditiously as possible. Since after receipt of the records at Family Court, Bhagalpur on 17.10.2022, respondent has been abstaining herself and has failed to produce evidence and the matter has been dragging for quite long time. The respondent is not at all interested in producing her witnesses.

¶15

Since the learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer only for expeditious disposal of the matrimonial case pending before the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur, I do not think there is any need to issue notice to the respondent and the matter is disposed of with direction to the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur to dispose of the petition pending before it within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶16

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶17

balmukund/-

¶18

Govind Gaurav Pandey v. Bhagya Shree

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govind Gaurav Pandey v. Bhagya Shree

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna Kumar @ Munna Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Jha @ Rohit Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Paras Prasad and Anr. Vs Satyendra Prasad

Sujit Kumar Yadav Vs Sri Laxman Mahto and Ors.

Bali Ram Singh Yadav Vs Mira Devi and Anr.