Disposed

M/s Pratibha Advertiising Private Ltd. v. M/s Kraft Outdoor Media Pvt. Ltd.

Patna HC2 Jul 2024C.Misc./216/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, in a civil miscellaneous petition seeking to tag a title suit with an eviction suit, directed the trial court to dispose of the title suit within nine months. The court noted that the petitioner had limited the prayer to early disposal of the title suit, rendering service of notice to other respondents unnecessary. The matter was disposed of with this direction.

What did the court decide?

Directed the trial court to dispose of Title Suit No. 165 of 2018 within nine months from the date of receipt/production of this order.

M/s Pratibha Advertiising Private Ltd. Vs M/s… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.216 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

M/s Pratibha Advertiising Private Ltd. through its Director Gaurav Prakash (Male) aged about 30 Years, S/o Sri Anant Prakash, Regd. Office at 432, 4th Floor, Adision Arced, Frazer Road, Police Station Kotwali, District-Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

M/s Kraft Outdoor Media Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Manish Kumar, (Male) aged about 52 Years, S/o Late Mohan Prasad, Regd. Office At 5th Floor, Bhawan, Frazer Road, Police Station Kotwali, Patna, Distirct-Patna

¶7

M/s Jaimangal Limited, through its Managing Director, Regd. Office at Avantee Hotel and Marketing Complex, Frazer Road, Police Station Kotwali, Patna Districft-Patna.

¶8

Poonam Prasad W/o Late Jagdish Prasad Resident of Mohalla-Patliputra Colony, Police Station Patliputra, District-Patna.

¶9

Gandharwa S/o Late Jagdish Prasad Resident of Mohalla-Patliputra Colony, Police Station Patliputra, District-Patna.

¶10

Juhi Prasad D/o Late Jagdish Prasad Resident of Mohalla-Patliputra Colony, Police Station Patliputra, District-Patna.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Narayan, Advocate Mr. Dinkar Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amit Srivastava, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, Advocate Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Navin Kumar Singh, Advocate

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶17

5 02-07-2024

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶19

learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of respondents.

¶20

The instant civil misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner with prayer to tag the Title Suit No. 165 of 2018 along with Eviction Suit No. 72 of 2018 pending before the learned Sub Judge-IX, Patna since both civil cases are being contested by the same parties in which common issues are involved and simultaneous trials of both the civil cases are necessary for its expeditious disposal.

¶21

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.216 of 2024(5) dt.02-07-2024 2/2

¶22

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to issuance of direction for expeditious disposal of Title Suit No. 165 of 2018.

¶23

Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1 submits that the issues are not common as one suit has been filed for eviction whereas the other suit is for specific performance of contract. However, he has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶24

Since, the petitioner confines his prayer for early disposal of Title Suit No. 165 of 2018 within a stipulated time period, I think no useful purpose would be served in issuing notice to the other respondents.

¶25

In the light of limited prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, the court concerned is directed to dispose of Title Suit No. 165 of 2018 preferably within nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The parties are directed to co-operate with the proceeding before the learned trial court.

¶26

Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation.

¶27

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶28

Ashish/- U

M/s Pratibha Advertiising Private Ltd. v. M/s Kraft Outdoor Media Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Pratibha Advertiising Private Ltd. v. M/s Kraft Outdoor Media Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shambhu Prasad Vs Shambhu Saran Prasad

Rinki Devi @ Rinki Kumari Vs Rajesh Kumar Pathak

Raj Naerayan Mahto Vs Bihar State Board Of Regligious Trust and Ors.

Madan Yadav @ Madan Prasad Yadav Vs Bimal Yadav

Arun Kumar Singh Vs Umesh Kumar Tiwary

Binod Kumar Singh Vs Sarita Devi