Petitioner failed to file requisites for issuance of notice on respondent nos. 3(ii) and 3(iii) despite a prior order giving four weeks. Office reported non-compliance; the court dismissed the petition for non-compliance of the order dated 15.04.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.54 of 2016
======================================================
Raj Naerayan Mahto son of Yugeshwar Mahto, resident of Village- Sauriya, Police Station- Jalley, District- Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Board : Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, Sr. Advocate For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. J.S. Arora, Sr. Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate Mr. G. Pratap, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
However, learned counsels for the respondents are present.
“Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is unable to get the present and correct address of respondent nos. 3(ii) and 3((iii) and seeks further time of four weeks for
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.54 of 2016(12) dt.01-07-2024
2/2
filing requisites for issuance of notice upon respondent nos. 3(ii) and 3(iii).
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
DKS/-
U
Raj Naerayan Mahto
Bihar State Board Of Religious Trust
The Circle Officer, Jalley, District- Darbhanga-cum Chairman, Shiv Mandir, Trust Committee
Sumit Kumar
Umesh Kumar Singh
Akhilesh Kumar Singh
Arun Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
