Petitioners failed to file a substitution petition for petitioner no. 2 despite prior orders granting time for compliance. The court dismissed the petition for non-compliance with its earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1025 of 2017
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1025 of 2017(4) dt.19-06-2024 2/2
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ray Saurabh Nath, Adv. Ms. Shalini Sinha, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Singh, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
4 19-06-2024
On 15.02.2024, following order was passed :
“The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks further time of two weeks for compliance of previous order dated 12.01.2024 for filing substitution petition for petitioner no.2
2. As prayed, he is permitted to comply the previous order dated 12.01.2024 within two weeks, failing which this petition will be dismissed.
3. List the matter on 12.03.2024.”
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
perwez
U
Savitri Devi
Ashok Singh @ Ashok Kumar Singh
Radha Singh
Tara Devi
Kiran Devi
Chinta
Arun Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
